Werner Herzog on Fans, Fanaticism and Baby Foxes
· anime
Werner Herzog on Fans, Fanaticism, and Baby Foxes
Werner Herzog has long been a provocateur, delighting in exploring the darker corners of human experience and the natural world. His latest film, Bucking Fastard, is no exception – a tale of two sisters who embark on a quixotic quest that defies both their family’s conventions and societal norms.
In recent interviews, Herzog has revealed a more unexpected side: one beset by anxiety about being labeled “trendy” or “politically correct.” His discomfort with terms like neurodivergence and ADHD is telling – not just because it suggests he’s out of touch with contemporary sensibilities, but also because it reveals a deeper tension between his artistic vision and the expectations of modern audiences.
For Herzog, genius and madness have always walked hand in hand. His characters often inhabit the fringes, driven by obsessions that border on monomania. In Bucking Fastard, the Holbrooke sisters are no exception – their all-consuming focus on digging a tunnel connecting County Sligo to the Orkneys is both absurd and strangely compelling.
Herzog’s aversion to being seen as “trendy” takes on added significance when contrasted with his own use of avant-garde language. He’s always been adept at finding new ways to describe the sublime – whether it’s the “landscape of the soul” or the “imagination.” However, when it comes to labeling his characters’ behavior, he suddenly becomes allergic to what he perceives as empty buzzwords.
This dichotomy is characteristic of Herzog’s conflicted relationship with modernity. On one hand, he’s a pioneer who’s consistently pushed boundaries and challenged conventional wisdom. On the other hand, he often expresses nostalgia for a bygone era – one that valued artistic expression over commercial appeal. His recent Instagram account serves as a case in point: while it may seem like an attempt to connect with younger audiences on his own terms, it also represents an effort to control his own narrative.
The irony of Herzog’s situation should be clear to anyone familiar with his career. He’s long been associated with the art-house crowd – those who prize intellectualism over mainstream appeal. However, as he approaches 80, he appears to be discovering a new audience: one that’s not just interested in his films but also in his personal life.
Bucking Fastard can be seen as a turning point for Herzog – a film that marks both his continued innovation and his growing irrelevance. The fact that he’s still winning over young audiences with his old-fashioned sensibilities is a testament to the enduring power of his art. However, it also raises questions about what role he’ll play in shaping the future of cinema – and whether his increasing reliance on nostalgia will ultimately become a liability.
As Herzog himself put it, “I’m not a control freak.” But as his Instagram account and Bucking Fastard’s reception demonstrate, he’s increasingly aware that he needs to adapt to changing times. The question is: how far will he go in embracing the present – and what will be the cost of his anachronistic anxiety?
Reader Views
- TIThe Ink Desk · editorial
Herzog's discomfort with modern labels is a double-edged sword: while it hints at his genuine unease with the times, it also risks coming across as a defensive posture. The irony isn't lost that he, a master of avant-garde language, finds himself allergic to certain buzzwords, yet continues to wield them liberally in his own work. This tension highlights a fundamental question: can an artist who is beholden to their own eccentricities truly be open to new ideas and perspectives?
- MPMira P. · comics critic
Herzog's anxiety about being labeled "trendy" strikes me as a deliberate act of separation from his audience, rather than a genuine discomfort. It's a clever ploy to rebrand himself as an outsider, untainted by modern sensibilities, which fits neatly into his aesthetic of the avant-garde. However, this posturing overlooks the fact that audiences are not simply passive consumers; they're also co-creators who bring their own meanings and contexts to artistic works. Herzog's aversion to buzzwords like neurodivergence reveals a deeper tension: can art truly defy categorization, or does it always run the risk of being contained by the very labels it seeks to evade?
- KAKenji A. · longtime fan
While Herzog's aversion to trendy labels is understandable, I worry that his nostalgia for a bygone era of artistic expression may be rooted in a lack of understanding about the very real struggles faced by neurodivergent individuals and others who don't fit into traditional molds. By dismissing these labels as "empty buzzwords," he risks silencing voices that need to be heard. To truly challenge conventional wisdom, artists must also listen to and learn from those on the fringes – not just observe them from a safe distance.